Rabotnicki vs Sileks

First League 7 Dec 2025, 12:00
0–3
HT 0–3
FULL TIME
Round 16

Match report

Sileks cruised past Rabotnicki 3-0 in the First League on 7 December 2025.

Half-time 0-3 Possession 53% - 47% On target 4 - 6 Corners 5 - 6 Yellow cards 4
First half vs second half
  1st half 2nd half
Ball Possession 47–53 —
Corners 2–1 3–5
Attacks 66–57 70–43
Match statistics
5 Corners 6
2 Substitution 5
136 Attacks 100
73 Dangerous Attacks 47
4 On Target 6
6 Off Target 3
53% Ball Possession 47%
Line-ups 4-4-2  vs  4-4-2
Goalkeeper Defender Midfielder Forward
Rabotnicki
Coach
Bazhe Lazarevski
Substitutes
  • 12 P. Jakimov
  • 4 D. Dimovski
  • 7 N. Manojlov
  • 14 J. Boshnakov
  • 18 N. Enyang
  • 21 Kalani Almeida
  • 27 D. Hodja
  • 31 D. Imeri
  • 32 M. Stefanovski
  • 44 A. Velic
  • 77 L. Zhaku
Sileks
Coach
Aleksandar Vasoski
Substitutes
  • 1 D. Bozinovski
  • 12 K. Gjorgjievski
  • 4 M. Hamzikj
  • 13 Z. Andonov
  • 18 O. Berovikj
  • 19 D. Mateski
  • 21 L. Jakimovski
  • 22 A. Hrvanovic
  • 26 M. Nikolic
  • 88 S. Stojov
Substitutions
  • 46' ↑ D. Imeri ↓ E. Adem Rabotnicki
  • 68' ↑ A. Hrvanovic ↓ I. Donov Sileks
  • 68' ↑ M. Nikolic ↓ A. Timovski Sileks
  • 72' ↑ J. Boshnakov ↓ F. Kadriu Rabotnicki
  • 79' ↑ D. Mateski ↓ D. Dodev Sileks
  • 85' ↑ Z. Andonov ↓ M. Mircevski Sileks
  • 85' ↑ O. Berovikj ↓ A. Alic Sileks
Cards
  • 36' G. Djekov Sileks
  • 42' F. Kadriu Rabotnicki
  • 44' D. Dodev Sileks
  • 66' C. Daley Rabotnicki
Head-to-head
Rabotnicki 4 7 draws 6 Sileks
2026-03-20 Rabotnicki vs Sileks 2 - 0
2025-12-07 Rabotnicki vs Sileks 0 - 3
2025-09-13 Sileks vs Rabotnicki 3 - 1
2025-07-02 Rabotnicki vs Sileks 0 - 0
2025-06-21 Rabotnicki vs Sileks 1 - 1
2025-06-17 Sileks vs Rabotnicki 0 - 0
Recent form
Rabotnicki D D D D L
Sileks D D D D W
Frequently asked questions
What was the final score in Rabotnicki vs Sileks?
Rabotnicki lost 0-3 against Sileks on 7 December 2025.
Who won Rabotnicki vs Sileks?
Sileks won the match 3-0.
Who had more possession in Rabotnicki vs Sileks?
Rabotnicki had 53% of possession, compared to 47% for the other side.