Atlético Tucumán vs Sarmiento

Liga Profesional Argentina - 2nd Phase 19 Jul 2022, 22:00
Atlético Tucumán
Atlético Tucumán
1–0
HT 0–0
FULL TIME
Sarmiento
Sarmiento
🏟 Estadio Monumental Presidente José Fierro (San Miguel de Tucumán, Provincia de Tucumán) 👤 J. Baliño Round 9

Match report

Atlético Tucumán edged past Sarmiento 1-0 in the Liga Profesional Argentina - 2nd Phase on 19 July 2022. The game was goalless at the break before all 1 goals arrived after half-time.

Atlético Tucumán dominated possession with 63% of the ball and had 25 shots to Sarmiento's 7.

The match was played at Estadio Monumental Presidente José Fierro (San Miguel de Tucumán, Provincia de Tucumán), with J. Baliño in charge.

Half-time 0-0 Possession 63% - 37% Shots 25 - 7 On target 8 - 2 Corners 7 - 0 Fouls 12 - 11 Yellow cards 5
8
Player of the match
Ignacio Maestro Puch
Atlético Tucumán · 1 goal
8 Bruno Bianchi 64 passes (81% accurate)
8 Manuel Capasso captained the side
8 Guillermo Acosta 74 passes (82% accurate)
8 Joaquín Pereyra captained the side
First half vs second half
  1st half 2nd half
Shots Total 12–5 13–2
Shots On Goal 2–1 6–1
Ball Possession 68–32 —
Corners 4–0 3–0
Attacks 41–33 44–42
Match statistics
5 Substitution 5
85 Attacks 75
74 Dangerous Attacks 38
3 On Target 3
7 Off Target 4
25 Shots Total 7
8 Shots On Goal 2
11 Shots Off Goal 5
6 Shots Blocked 0
12 Shots Inside Box 4
13 Shots Outside Box 3
12 Fouls 11
7 Corners 0
2 Offsides 0
63% Ball Possession 37%
2 Yellow Cards 3
2 Saves 6
459 Passes Total 277
387 Passes Accurate 196
Line-ups 4-4-2  vs  5-3-2
Goalkeeper Defender Midfielder Forward
Atlético Tucumán · 4-4-2
16 C. Lampe
21 M. Garay 2 B. Bianchi 26 M. Capasso 39 M. Orihuela
12 C. Rius 8 G. Acosta 23 R. Carrera 22 J. Pereyra
11 C. Menéndez 18 R. Rodríguez
Sarmiento · 5-3-2
24 S. Meza
25 G. Bettini 22 M. Guanini 2 G. Sauro 16 F. Andueza 17 J. Rosso
19 L. Castro 52 E. Méndez 39 F. Paradela
32 L. Gondou 36 J. Toledo
Atlético Tucumán
Coach
L. Pusineri
Substitutes
  • 17 Tomás Marchiori
  • 35 Jonathan Sandoval
  • 27 Nicolás Thaller
  • 30 Gabriel Risso Patrón
  • 19 Eugenio Isnaldo
  • 28 Andrés Balanta
  • 24 Renzo Tesuri
  • 31 Gastón Gil Romero
  • 15 Francisco Di Franco
  • 37 Mateo Coronel
  • 32 Ignacio Maestro Puch
  • 9 Augusto Lotti
Sarmiento
Coach
I. Damonte
Substitutes
  • 38 Josué Ayala
  • 14 David Gallardo
  • 10 Sergio Quiroga
  • 5 Fernando Martinez
  • 33 Gabriel Díaz
  • 26 Yair Arismendi
  • 28 Joaquin Gho
  • 29 Manuel Garcia
  • 4 Luis Garnier
  • 21 Julián Brea
  • 8 Guido Mainero
  • 9 Jonathan Torres
Substitutions
  • 62' ↑ Y. Arismendi ↓ F. Paradela Sarmiento
  • 62' ↑ J. Torres ↓ J. Toledo Sarmiento
  • 62' ↑ J. Brea ↓ L. Gondou Sarmiento
  • 73' ↑ M. Coronel ↓ R. Carrera Atlético Tucumán
  • 73' ↑ I. Maestro Puch ↓ C. Menéndez Atlético Tucumán
  • 80' ↑ G. Mainero ↓ J. Rosso Sarmiento
  • 83' ↑ A. Lotti ↓ R. Ruiz Rodríguez Atlético Tucumán
  • 83' ↑ R. Tesuri ↓ C. Rius Atlético Tucumán
  • 85' ↑ S. Quiroga ↓ L. Castro Sarmiento
  • 90+4' ↑ G. Gil Romero ↓ J. Pereyra Atlético Tucumán
Cards
  • 5' M. Guanini Sarmiento
  • 56' F. Paradela Sarmiento
  • 63' J. Pereyra Atlético Tucumán
  • 69' G. Acosta Atlético Tucumán
  • 90' J. Arismendi Sarmiento
Head-to-head
Atlético Tucumán 3 1 draws 3 Sarmiento
2026-02-08 Sarmiento Junin vs Atl. Tucuman 2 - 1
2025-08-18 Sarmiento vs Atl. Tucumán 2 - 2
2025-02-14 Atlético Tucumán vs Sarmiento 5 - 0
2022-07-19 Atlético Tucumán vs Sarmiento 1 - 0
2022-02-10 Sarmiento vs Atlético Tucumán 1 - 0
2021-08-20 Sarmiento vs Atlético Tucumán 3 - 0
Recent form
Atlético Tucumán D D D W W
Sarmiento D D W L L
Frequently asked questions
What was the final score in Atlético Tucumán vs Sarmiento?
Atlético Tucumán won 1-0 against Sarmiento on 19 July 2022.
Who won Atlético Tucumán vs Sarmiento?
Atlético Tucumán won the match 1-0.
Where was Atlético Tucumán vs Sarmiento played?
The match was played at Estadio Monumental Presidente José Fierro (San Miguel de Tucumán, Provincia de Tucumán).
Who had more possession in Atlético Tucumán vs Sarmiento?
Atlético Tucumán had 63% of possession, compared to 37% for the other side.